Eric Noone is a young pickpocket who gets a job by mistake at Fackham Hall, a grand English house in 1931. The Davenport family needs a daughter to marry a male cousin so the family can keep the house. Poppy runs off with a manure seller, so her parents push Rose toward that same cousin. Eric and Rose fall in love, a murder puts Eric in jail, and the wedding plans fall apart. The movie is a loud, rude parody of fancy period dramas, full of slapstick and silly word jokes. Rose does not want a husband her parents choose, and she likes reading more than old rules about how a young woman should act. The film treats those rules, the snobby rich family, and the servants as jokes. The real story stays on the romance, the murder mix-up, and nonstop crude humor. Eric learns he is the lost heir, clears his name, and marries Rose. Lady Davenport's old views stay part of the punchlines, including a final gag that she spends her life trying to undo women's right to vote.
Community feedback
Was our 20% Woke rating accurate?
Loading review details…
Breakdown
These are the editorial factors and ratings behind our score for Fackham Hall.
Woke representation / casting
Not present. The main family, servants, and romantic leads match a 1930s English country house. A wedding guest named Darvesh Khalid has a small part explaining who inherits the house.
0%
Woke political dialogue
Rose is written as a young woman who wants a say in her own life, and that idea helps her reject a rude cousin. The film also makes a short joke about the Bechdel test, using twin sisters who only talk about men. Lady Davenport calls her unmarried daughter a dried-up husk at age 23, and the joke makes that old insult look foolish. These lines are quick gags inside a film packed with unrelated rude jokes. They do not turn into speeches.
8%
Identity-driven story themes
Rose refuses a marriage her family picks and wants control of her own life. The film makes old rules for women part of the joke, including the idea that a woman is too old to marry at 23. She is still the romantic lead, and Eric remains the hero who clears his name and stops the wedding. This idea is easy to notice in her story, but it stays a small piece of a much larger farce.
24%
Western institutional / cultural critique
The film laughs at snobby aristocrats, strict class rules, and silly marriage customs in an old English house. A sign jokes that servants joining a union causes cancer, and the vicar keeps turning church words into rude jokes. A final gag says the vicar died in a bunker in Berlin in 1945. These jokes target rich manners and a foolish clergyman. They do not build a modern attack on the wider Western world.
12%
Woke character or canon changes
Not relevant. The story is an original spoof, so it does not change an older character, book, or real history for identity reasons.
0%
Anti-woke backlash and complaints
One review account posted before opening day that the trailer looked funny but that church jokes might be a regular target. That post drew only a small number of views and did not start a wider fight. A later viewer told Jimmy Carr the movie was a relief from woke comedy. No news outlet treated the film as a woke fight, and critics argued about whether the jokes were funny.
8%
Creator track record context
The director and the writers have low stored scores, from 4 to 12. Most producers also sit in the low range. Two executive producers, Babak Anvari and David Levine, have higher stored scores because of other work on politics and hard social stories. Their role here is limited, and this film is a joke-filled period spoof.
14%
Production